If best practices worked on their own, none of us would be here today

Let me save you a seat at the most expensive table in advertising

The room is taking notes. Some are recording it. A few are already opening their laptops to implement what they're hearing, right there from the hotel ballroom, one hand on the keyboard and the other holding a $14 coffee.

And here's what nobody in that room will say out loud: if this information worked the way it's being presented — as a recipe you follow and then collect your results — the person on stage would have no reason to be on stage. They'd be on a beach somewhere, running the recipe.

The most dangerous phrase in paid media

"Best practice."

I want you to hear what that phrase actually says. It says: this worked for someone, somewhere, under conditions you don't fully understand, with an offer you haven't seen, for an audience you don't share, at a point in time that has already passed.

And now it's being handed to you as though it's a law of physics.

You're not gaining an edge by following best practices. You're gaining entry to the most crowded lane on the highway.

Here's what I've seen in the real world, with real budgets, over and over again: the accounts that break through are never the ones that followed the playbook better than everyone else. They're the ones who made a hypothesis nobody else had tested. They saw something in their data — or in their gut, honestly — that didn't align with the conventional wisdom, and instead of defaulting to what Google recommends or what the last webinar said, they tested their own idea.

What, then? 

I had a conversation with a potential client recently. Auditing their account. I spent a significant amount of time trying to figure out what the account strategy was.

There wasn't one.

Not a bad one. Not a misguided one. None. Just launching and pausing campaigns until something stuck. A slot machine with a Google Ads login.

And I'll tell you what made it worse: every single setting in the account was technically correct. The bid strategy was what Google recommends. The targeting was set up the way the documentation says to set it up. The campaign types were appropriate. If you ran a checklist of best practices against this account, it would score well.

The account was a textbook. And it was bleeding money.

Because best practices will tell you how to build a campaign. They will never tell you what to think while you're running one. They'll give you the instrument. They won't teach you to play.

Nobody gets fired for following best practices 

Let me tell you why best practices are so seductive, and I'll be blunt about it.

They remove the need to think.

That's the product. That's what's actually being sold — at every conference, in every course, in every "ultimate guide to Google Ads." The promise is: follow these steps and you won't have to make hard decisions under uncertainty. Someone else already figured it out. Just copy the homework.

And listen — I understand the appeal. Thinking is hard. Forming a hypothesis is vulnerable. You might be wrong. You might waste money on an idea that doesn't work. Whereas following best practices gives you cover: "I did what the experts recommended." Nobody gets fired for following best practices. They get fired for results, eventually, but at least the blame is diffused.

But here's the thing every direct response practitioner learns sooner or later, usually after writing a very large check to the school of hard knocks: the market doesn't reward you for following the rules. The market rewards you for understanding the rules well enough to know when to break them.

Every breakthrough campaign I've been part of — every one — involved a decision that would have failed a best practices audit. A bidding approach that wasn't recommended. A creative format that wasn't standard. A targeting decision that went against the documentation. An idea that came from a hypothesis, not a handbook.

The brands that grow — really grow, not just have a good month — have one thing in common. It's not a budget. It's not creative talent, although that helps. It's not even the platform they're using.

It's that someone, somewhere in the organization, is generating original hypotheses and testing them with discipline.

The expensive lie of "proven frameworks."

I need to address something directly, because I see it everywhere and it's costing people real money.

There's a growing industry of people selling "proven frameworks" for media buying. Seven-figure ad account blueprints. The exact funnel that generates $X per month. Copy-paste campaign structures.

And some of these people are genuine. They really did get those results. I'm not questioning that.

What I'm questioning is the premise that their results are transferable through imitation.

A framework extracted from one account, one offer, one audience, one moment in time, and then sold as universally applicable is not a framework. It's a souvenir. It tells you where someone has been. It doesn't tell you where you need to go.

The accounts that actually perform don't use someone else's framework. They build their own. Brick by brick, hypothesis by hypothesis, cycle by cycle. They use best practices as a starting point — the way you'd use a map of the general territory — and then they navigate based on their own data, their own testing, their own learnings.

That navigation can't be bought. It can't be downloaded. It can only be built through the patient, sometimes boring, often unglamorous work of forming a question, testing it, reading the answer, and forming a better question next time.

So here's what I'm actually asking.

Stop looking for the right playbook. Start looking for the right question.

If best practices worked on their own — truly, reliably, universally worked — none of us would be here. There would be no conferences, no consultants, no agencies, no webinars. There'd be a manual. You'd follow it. It would work. End of story.

But that's not how this works. It has never been how this works. The market is a living thing. It shifts. It adapts. It gets bored. What worked last quarter may not work this quarter. What works for your competitor may fail for you. The only constant is that the person who's testing original ideas with discipline will always — always — outperform the person who's executing someone else's playbook with precision.

Precision without original thinking is just efficient mediocrity.

And I don't know about you, but I didn't get into this business to be efficiently mediocre.

💌 Like this newsletter? Let's continue the conversation

Get in touch with us by responding to this email or tagging us on LinkedIn or Instagram, and sharing your thoughts. Your feedback helps us keep our newsletter relevant and interesting.