The framing formula: How word choice drives million-dollar conversions💰

In the last three breakdowns, we showed how $4.3M in ads scaled by:

• Hijacking existing beliefs 

• Turning proof into stories

• Sequencing like closers, not teachers 

Now we’re dissecting the final layer: language itself.

The words aren’t just sharper - they’re framed to make losses sting harder than wins, vague claims feel precise, and prices look like steals.

Here’s how these ads weaponize framing, and what to steal for your own copy.

The language behind the spend

Same three ads. Different lens.

We already showed you how these campaigns weaponize psychology. Now let's dissect the exact words and phrases that turn browsers into buyers.

Here's what most marketers miss: it's not what you say, it's how you frame what you say.

The difference between "reduces your risk" and "completely eliminates the threat" isn't semantic. It's behavioral. One triggers uncertainty. The other triggers safety.

These million-dollar ads don't just use better words - they use frames that align with how brains actually evaluate options.

Losses > Wins

Trap: Selling gains.
Play: Position as protection from losses.

Case Connect: "Tyler was skeptical because the insurance company told him they'd give him $5,000. He ended up getting $120,000. That's $115,000 more."

They're not promising Tyler will "make money." They're showing him what he would have lost by accepting the insurance offer. Loss aversion in action. Losing $115K feels worse than gaining $115K feels good.

Splash Spray: "Unlike name brand chemical cleaners that can enter the bloodstream causing lung disease, birth defects and other respiratory illnesses."

They don't lead with "get a cleaner home." They lead with "stop poisoning your family."

Digestive supplement: "This is fat that would otherwise take endless hours of cardio, weeks of starving yourself on diets to get rid of."

Not "lose weight faster." It's "stop wasting months of effort."

👉 What we'd steal: Reframe benefits as loss prevention.

Specific > Vague

The trap: Using general, safe language.

The play: Using hyper-specific details that sound authoritative.

The "four questions" authority

"The app asks you four simple questions, then compares your car accident to millions of other accidents."

Why four questions? Why not "a few"? Specific numbers feel more credible. "Four questions" sounds like a scientific assessment. "A few questions" sounds arbitrary.

The "30 seconds" precision

All three ads use exact timeframes:

• "30 seconds or less"

• "In seconds"

• "One simple poop per day"

The "5 pounds" measurement

"Up to 5 pounds of toxic waste from your body."

Why 5 pounds? Because "some waste" sounds vague. "5 pounds" sounds measured.

👉 What we'd steal: Replace vague language with exact numbers. Use specific timeframes, quantities, and measurements even when ranges would be more accurate.

High anchor > Real price

The trap: Leading with your actual price.

The play: Setting a high anchor, then making your real price feel like theft.

Splash Spray's $40 → $20 move

"Splash Spray's regular price is $40, but through this special promotion, you can get an exclusive 50% discount and order it for just $20."

Classic anchoring. $40 makes $20 feel like a massive deal, even though $20 was probably always the target.

Case Connect's $5K → $120K contrast

"Insurance company told him they'd give him $5,000. He ended up getting $120,000."

The $5K becomes an anchor that makes $120K feel like a windfall.

Digestive supplement's effort anchor

"Endless hours of cardio, weeks of starving yourself on diets."

They anchor against the "cost" of traditional methods. Taking a supplement feels effortless by comparison.

👉 What we'd steal: Always present a higher-cost alternative first. Make your price/effort/time investment feel small by contrast.

Categories > Competitors

The trap: Positioning against direct competitors.

The play: Positioning against the entire outdated approaches.

Case Connect vs. "The legal system"

"I probably would have called a random attorney, and we all know what that would have done. I would have been screwed over."

They don't attack Law Firm X. They attack the entire traditional legal approach.

Splash Spray vs. "Chemical cleaning"

"Why are we still getting on our hands and knees to clean? So he put his chemistry skills to the test and invented an alternative."

Not competing with Lysol—positioning against manual scrubbing as primitive.

Digestive supplement vs. "Diet culture"

"Secret pooping habit that keeps them effortlessly thin, even without diet or exercise."

They don't attack Weight Watchers. They position against the entire "calories in, calories out" paradigm.

👉 What we'd steal: Don't fight Brand X. Fight Approach X. Make your solution feel like evolution, not competition.

Discovery > Sales pitch

The trap: Presenting your solution as a product pitch.

The play: Presenting your solution as a scientific breakthrough.

The "Scientists Discovered" frame

"Scientists discovered some people have a secret pooping habit... Scientists previously thought was useless. Yet now, they are quickly backtracking."

"Discovery" language positions information as objective truth rather than marketing claims. It bypasses sales resistance.

The "Frustrated Expert" frame

"It was invented by a prominent but frustrated chemist with a very simple problem."

The chemist isn't "trying to sell you something"—he's solving his own problem with expertise.

The "Research" frame

"The research behind it is so powerful that you owe yourself just a few minutes to see if this can work for you."

They're not asking you to buy—they're asking you to evaluate breakthrough research.

👉 What we'd steal: Frame your solution as a discovery or breakthrough. Position yourself as sharing information, not selling something.

Urgency > Scarcity

The trap: Using obvious countdown timers and fake deadlines.

The play: Creating urgency through missed opportunity framing.

Case Connect's "Limited Awareness" play

"I want you to be one of the car accident victims that are taking advantage of this because not many people are doing it yet."

The urgency isn't "limited time"—it's "limited awareness." Act before everyone else figures this out.

Splash Spray's "Price Increase" reality

"The price is set to increase at any moment. Why risk buying full price tomorrow when you can buy for a guarantee today?"

"Price increases" feel more legitimate than arbitrary deadlines. It's economic reality, not fake scarcity.

Digestive supplement's "Access" frame

"Click below before video expires!"

Urgency around information access, not purchasing. Feels educational, not salesy.

What we'd steal: Create urgency around opportunity, information access, or economic factors rather than artificial deadlines.The War Room Playbook

The pattern is clear:

• Losses > Wins

• Specific > Vague

• High Anchor > Real Price

• Categories > Competitors

• Discovery > Sales Pitch

• Urgency > Scarcity

What kills most copy: vague claims, gain-focused benefits, fake scarcity, or fighting competitors head-on.

If you sell benefits, you’re pushing uphill. If you sell frames, you scale.

The War Room Playbook

These ads don't just use "power words"—they use frames that align with how brains actually evaluate options.

💌 Like this newsletter? Let's continue the conversation

Get in touch with us by responding to this email or tagging us on LinkedIn or Instagram and sharing your thoughts. Your feedback helps us keep our newsletter relevant and interesting.