The $4.3M in ad spend ads we pulled apart don’t “teach.” They don’t warm up. They sequence like closers. They are leading with the knockout, framing value with contrast, and stacking authority before you’ve had time to doubt. Then, they turn small clicks into real commitment, anchoring every step to identity.

Sequence like a closer, not a teacher

The trap: Building up to your strongest benefit.

The play: Leading with the knockout punch, then supporting it.

Lead with the big number

Every one of the three ads we analyzed opens with its strongest claim:

• "$60,000 for my car crash"

  

  Check out the ad in VidTao

• "Dissolves oven grease in seconds"

  

  Find the ad in VidTao

• "Secret pooping habit keeps them effortlessly thin"

  

  Watch the ad in VidTao

Most ads bury their main benefit in the middle, thinking they need to "earn" the right to make big claims. These ads know better. They anchor on maximum benefit immediately.

The psychology: First impressions create cognitive anchors. Everything else gets evaluated against that initial claim.

Use contrast to amplify value

"Tyler was skeptical because the insurance company told him they'd give him $5,000. He ended up getting $120,000. That's $115,000 more."

The same $120K feels dramatically better when contrasted against $5K. They didn't just share Tyler's result - they made it feel massive by comparison.

Create authority halos early

Each ad establishes credibility fast:

• "One of the largest settlement companies in the world"

• "Invented by a prominent chemist"

• "Scientists discovered"

These aren't just credibility markers - they're perception filters. Once your brain categorizes something as "legitimate," it interprets everything else more favorably.

What we'd steal: Don't build to your best benefit. Start with it. Use inferior alternatives for contrast. Establish credibility halos before making claims.

Turn clicks into commitment

The trap: Asking for the sale upfront.

The play: Creating psychological investment through micro-commitments.

Four simple questions

"The app asks you four simple questions, then instantly tells you if you qualify for a huge check."

This isn't lead qualification - it's commitment escalation. By answering questions about their accident, users become mentally invested in getting a settlement.

The psychology: Small actions create psychological investment. Once you've acted as if a settlement is possible, not following through feels wasteful.

Free assessment → Qualified lead

The "instant qualification" creates momentum. Users invested time and attention. They received a specific dollar amount. Not continuing would mean wasting that investment.

Identity alignment

All three ads position their solutions as choices smart people make:

• Case Connect users work the system

• Splash Spray users choose safe alternatives

• Digestive supplement users understand cutting-edge gut health science

Taking action aligns users with these positive identities. Cognitive dissonance maintains that alignment.

What we'd steal: Start with tiny asks (watch video, answer questions, take quiz). Each micro-commitment builds investment in your solution. Frame actions as identity-aligned choices.

The million-dollar blueprint

These aren't better ads because of bigger budgets or slicker creative. They're better because they understand how brains actually work.

The pattern:

1. Channel existing beliefs (don't fight them)

2. Create vivid proof (stories over stats)

3. Sequence for impact (big claims first)

4. Build commitment (micro-actions create investment)

What kills most ads:

• Fighting market beliefs instead of leveraging them

• Leading with weak claims and building to strong ones

• Using forgettable testimonials instead of transportive stories

• Asking for big commitments without building psychological investment

We've tested this across dozens of accounts: ads don't win by being more convincing. They win by being more aligned with how people already think and decide.

🔜 Next up: How word choice drives million-dollar conversions

In our next newsletter, we'll break down the exact words and phrases these $4.3M ads use to frame their offers. Because it's not just about what you say i it's about how you say it.

💌 Like this newsletter? Let's continue the conversation

Get in touch with us by responding to this email or tagging us on LinkedIn or Instagram and sharing your thoughts. Your feedback helps us keep our newsletter relevant and interesting.